The ‘Paradox’ of Forest Certification: Why Responsible Standards Draw a Line

Recent commentary has reignited debate about the role of certification in addressing legacy deforestation in Indonesia. This debate is welcome. Public-interest groups and watchdog organisations play an important role in scrutinising land-use decisions, and their work contributes to greater accountability across the forest sector.

Some conclusions, however, overlook how certification functions in practice. Certification is not designed to rewrite past land-use decisions. It is designed to ensure that unacceptable practices must stop, and that future forest management meets strict environmental and social requirements.

In Indonesia, the endorsed national standard includes a firm cut-off date, the 31 December 2010, for the conversion of natural forests. Areas converted after these dates cannot be certified and cannot supply PEFC-certified material.

The ‘Paradox’ of Certification: Why Responsible Standards Draw a Line – PEFC – Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification

Back To Top
×Close search
Search